Skip to content

Library

FACC et al. vs. DOL – DOL Response to FACC Motion for Preliminary Injunction 6-14-2024

Below is the response from DOL, as a defendant, opposing the motion from FACC for a preliminary injunction that would suspend enforcement of the fiduciary rule. Here is an excerpt from the defendants’ filing: “Plaintiffs—insurance professionals and a trade association representing insurance professionals—seek a preliminary injunction and stay of the

Read More »

Hispanic Leadership Fund Files Amicus Brief 6-3-24

The Hispanic Leadership Fund (“HLF”) has a strong interest in this case. DOL’s latest rule redefining who is an investment advice fiduciary (“2024 Fiduciary Rule”) is effectively the same as the very harmful 2016 Fiduciary Rule that was invalidated in a 2018 decision by the United States Court of Appeals

Read More »

U.S. Chamber of Commerce Files Amicus Brief 5-31-24

The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America (“Chamber”) is the world’s largest business federation, representing approximately 300,000 direct members and indirectly representing the interests of more than three million businesses and professional organizations of every size, in every industry sector, and from every region of the country.

Read More »

Complaint: FACC et al. vs DOL 05-02-2024

FACC is disappointed that the DOL has chosen to go down this same tired path with yet another proposal that blatantly violates the 2018 ruling by the Fifth Circuit and arrogantly ignores limitations of its authority under ERISA. The DOL’s new rules are yet another assault on the financial services

Read More »

FACC Comment Letter – Opposing DOL Fiduciary Rule

FACC sincerely hopes the DOL will reflect in earnest over our concerns about this ill-conceived package of rules and exemptions even though DOL and FACC are engaged in ongoing litigation relating to prior DOL pronouncements. FACC is driven primarily by its commitment to a strong marketplace in which independent agents can function effectively in delivering quality fixed annuity and insurance products to clients who, in turn, want choices for protecting their assets and achieving a secure retirement. It is FACC’s hope that the DOL will reconsider and withdraw its proposed rulemaking, which will otherwise merely serve to unleash a new round of litigation and confusion for retirement savers at a time when those energies could be spent more productively working towards better education of consumers, improving coordination among regulators, and strengthening laws that govern America’s retirement system.

Read More »

FACC Testimony DOL Hearing 12-12-23

FACC believes the DOL is trying to turn 50 years of ERISA history upside down – which we think is wrong – both legally and as a matter of public policy.  Putting aside the legal issues for a moment – those will have their day if this proposal goes forward – we believe the DOL has created a “false narrative” – for lack of a better phrase – suggesting there is a need to bring Title I regulation for employer plans to IRAs sold to individual consumers covered by Title II. 

Read More »